Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Bagnis vs Chase Buchanan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bagnis vs Buchanan analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Bagnis vs Chase Buchanan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bagnis 1 - 0 Buchanan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bagnis has won 51.55% of points on his second serve, while Buchanan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bagnis, in recent form, has won 50.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Buchanan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bagnis has saved 64.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Buchanan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bagnis has won 64.18% of matches played (W/L 43/ 24), with Buchanan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bagnis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 597/ 368), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Buchanan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 105/ 53), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Bagnis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 21/ 11), where as Buchanan has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bagnis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bagnis winning 2 and Buchanan winning 0. The last match between Bagnis and Buchanan was at the Sarasota Challenger, 18-04-2015, Semifinals, Clay with Facundo Bagnis getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bagnis and Buchanan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bagnis winning 0 times and Buchanan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bagnis winning 0, and Buchanan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bagnis has played against opponents with an average rank of 275.87 while Buchanan has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bagnis has won 79% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Buchanan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bagnis has converted 43.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Buchanan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
120
Rank
55
High
34
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
158
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
59% (636-438)
Career Total W/L
55% (173-142)
70% (28-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,274,440
Career Prize Money
$24,535
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Chase Buchanan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:39 | 1:41:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (56/81) | 65% (37/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (42/56) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 50% (10/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 10% (1/10) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (23/57) | 36% (29/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Chase Buchanan
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Chase Buchanan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (28/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (58/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (467/411) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (27/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 149 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 88 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 270.77 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1844/2878) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1254/1844) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (533/1034) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (124/287) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1165/2851) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 82% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (28/39) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (25/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (25/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Facundo Bagnis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Facundo Bagnis
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Facundo Bagnis
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
92%
(
12 of
13)
24
Total Points Won
2
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gregoire Barrere
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
63%
(
31 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chase Buchanan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Chase Buchanan
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chase Buchanan
Player
Jonathan Ho
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
42%
(
36 of
85)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Chase Buchanan
Player
David O'Hare
63%
(
69 of
109)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
18 of
70)
85
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chase Buchanan
Player
Luca Margaroli
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Chase Buchanan
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paolo Lorenzi
Player
Chase Buchanan
45%
(
19 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Chase Buchanan
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Chase Buchanan
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dennis Novikov
Player
Chase Buchanan
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chase Buchanan
Player
John-Patrick Smith
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Bagnis Vs Buchanan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
